SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES

CITY OF GARFIELD HEIGHTS, OHIO

 

Thursday, January 24, 2008

 

Vincent Liotta, Chairman of the Safety Committee, called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m.

 

Members Present:     Michael Dudley, Sr., Councilman of Ward 1

Tracy Mahoney, Councilwoman of Ward 6

Nancy Marincic, Councilwoman of Ward 2

 

Others Present:          Michael Abella, Jr., Councilman of Ward 7

Thomas Murphy, Police Chief

Debra Sarnowski, Councilwoman of Ward 4

Joseph Suster, Councilman of Ward 5

                                   

CHMN LIOTTA: Tonight we’re going to talk about if we need additional police officers, how many are needed and how do we go about getting them? What I’d like to do right now is turn it over to you, Nancy.

 

CLWN MARINCIC:  I‘d just like to say a couple of words. I’ve attended a couple of Block Watch meetings where there were police officers in attendance and they felt we could use more police officers—as many as two on each shift. That would be six officers, which we all know we can’t afford. I called Police Chief Murphy and discussed it with him a little bit and he said he’d like it if we had a meeting other than during the Finance Meetings because he would like to discuss it with Council and give his point of view regarding it and if we do feel we need one, are we even able to afford to hire one this year? One thing the Chief said to me was do we hire them at the risk of laying them off? Does that make any sense at all? So I would like to turn the meeting over to you, Chief, and you tell us if the crime has increased to the point where you feel we need them?

 

CHIEF MURPHY:  Let me just say this. As we sit here this evening, I think we have an adequately staffed police department. We are able to respond to the calls. I have also attended the Ward meetings and Block Watch meetings. I was at two today and I never heard that the police department was not there and did not respond or if there was any delay in their response. I’ve asked some of you folks this same thing and you indicated that you have not heard that complaint either. That would be the first warning sign that there were not enough police officers if we were not able to respond to the calls as they come in from the citizens and prioritize them in time. With that, that’s basically, at this point I would feel that with the officers that we have we are able to do what we have to do. Obviously if there was an increase in somebody wanting another unit, some other positions on the police department, there would have to be additional people. But as we stand now, I don’t know what, who said what at a Ward meeting or Block Watch meeting that you’re referring to, but even if somebody said what did they say? Two and three shifts? We actually have four shifts so I don’t know where they came up with that? That’s eight.

 

CLWN MARINCIC:  What was said was we could probably use six more officers on any given day.

 

CHIEF MURPHY:  Well there are times when the calls for service prioritize and someone may have to wait a little bit for a lockout or barking dogs, etc. but I have not heard (and I’ve asked many of you folks the same thing) that anybody has had to wait for anything of any serious nature for a response from a police officer. I haven’t heard that and from what I’ve heard from you folks you haven’t heard that either. That would be the first warning sign. As I‘ve said before and said to Clmn Suster and the Mayor, if I feel that I could justify coming before Council or to the Mayor’s office to ask permission to hire an additional police officer, I would be the first one to do it, but I’d have to be able to justify it. For the money end of it, you don’t hire people with the possibility of laying them off. Because if you ever lay a police officer or a firefighter off it would be a devastating thing for this community or any community. Has the Finance Director had any input here? Has he mentioned anything to anybody about the finances? Because I spoke to him about this a couple times last week and asked him if he was going to advise anybody about anything and did not receive an answer from him. I don’t know if he ever did. I have some statistics here.

 

CLWN MAHONEY:  Dick told me we can’t afford it now.

 

CHIEF MURPHY:  Well, for whatever it’s worth, Clmn Liotta, you asked me if I could get some numbers. The number I could come up with is, I think, a pretty accurate number. Money wise, to hire a police officer to start would be about $77,000.00 a year. Obviously, after two years that jumps up to $97,000.00. That includes benefits, pension, etc., everything the City has to pay, salary, hospitalization, Workers’ Comp, etc. would be included in those numbers as of today.

 

CLWN MAHONEY:  In order to put in an SRO we’d have to hire somebody, correct?

 

CHIEF MURPHY:  Yes, or if for some reason we want to start a motorcycle unit.

 

CLMN ABELLA:  What’s the start right now?

 

CHIEF MURPHY:  The start right now is $44,316.00.

 

CLWN SARNOWSKI:  Are we planning on losing any? To retirement or anything?

 

CHIEF MURPHY:  One of my notes here is I can’t see in the future. I don’t know. I don’t have anything that I would know right now that some one is planning on retiring. I can’t see in the future whether there will be retirement, disabilities, sicknesses, resignations. I don’t know that as we sit here today. Anything else is in the crystal ball and I don’t know that. It could happen. Right now we have 62. Sixty-two with the last officer that we just appointed, which was a replacement. So we have one that just started at the Police Academy, another one that just got out of the Police Academy and started field training work last week. So right now we have 62 sworn policemen.

 

CLMN SUSTER:  Isn’t there a formula they use for so many policemen per thousand people in the City?

 

CHIEF MURPHY:  There is, I am told. I don’t know what the exact number is. I’m not a real big statistics person because you can usually maneuver those things around any way you want. Obviously places like Cuyahoga Heights, Valley View and Independence--their numbers are going to go off the chart one way, the City of Cleveland’s going to go off the chart the other way. There is a number; I just don’t know it.

 

CLWN MARINCIC:  At City View, do you think there will come a time that they might need their own private security?

 

CHIEF MURPHY:  Again, I can’t answer that. Right now City View has not burdened us beyond any kind of anticipation anybody thought it would be. Maybe even less than some thought it would be?

 

CLWN MAHONEY:  Don’t they have their own security there?

 

CHIEF MURPHY:  No.

 

CLWN MAHONEY:  They don’t?

 

CHIEF MURPHY:  No.

 

CLMN SUSTER:  Sure. They have a guy that rides around the parking lot.

 

CHIEF MURPHY: They do?

 

CLMN SUSTER:  They have a guy that just rides arong the parking lot. He has nothing to do with inside stores.

 

CHIEF MURPHY:  That’s hit skip.

 

CLMN SUSTER:  I think he’s from Tenable

 

CHIEF MURPHY:  I don’t think it’s Tenable. But again, it’s only for several hours a week and it’s not inside the stores. Giant Eagle hired somebody and I think they’re the only one. Giant Eagle hired security inside the store. Do you know what the future holds? I can comment on what we have now and how many officers are on the platoon.

 

CLMN SUSTER:  I know Wal-Mart’s policy is to handle any problems they have, even with shoplifting, within the store. That’s because they don’t prosecute.

 

CLWN MARINCIC:  They changed that.

 

CHIEF MURPHY: They do now.

 

CLWN MARINCIC:  They are prosecuting now.

 

CHIEF MURPHY: I don’t think there’s a policy by Wal-Mart—you know, Mr. Wal-Mart. It’s like the individual store has one. Individual stores I guess are allowed to do pretty much their own policy. Whoever was the manager in the store when it first opened was not very aggressive with shoplifters. Now he’s no longer there. Whoever the new manager is has been much more aggressive with the shoplifters so we have had more calls and arrests over there, maybe in the last six or eight months, maybe, or a little bit more than that. In the beginning, you’re right; we didn’t have any because they didn’t pursue it. The other stores haven’t really had that much of a problem.

 

CLWN MARINCIC:  You said you brought some statistics with you? Could you compare them to a year ago?

 

CHIEF MURPHY: No, we don’t even have those done. Crime wise? We don’t even have those done for the year. No, the statistics I have are what it costs for a police officer, how many we have, how long it takes to train them. As I said, if we lose a police officer for any reason there is a long period of time between the time that the person leaves and the time that someone is on the road to take their place. Again, that’s just part of the system. So many months for this, so many months for that. Civil Service is involved. There is a whole gamut of things, so it could go anywhere from four to five months to maybe 18 months.

 

CLWN MARINCIC:  Could I have a copy of your annual report?

 

CHIEF MURPHY: Yes.

 

CLWN MARINCIC:  Could I have a copy of last year’s too?

 

CHIEF MURPHY: We have not been asked for any but we certainly can do that when they’re prepared.

 

CHMN LIOTTA:  Would you give one to all of Council?

 

CHIEF MURPHY: Certainly.

 

CLWN SARNOWSKI:  We have two new policemen so we have two more?

 

CHIEF MURPHY: No, those are replacements.

 

CLWN SARNOWSKI:  So we’re really short now?

 

CHIEF MURPHY: Well, we’ve got the same. We’ve got the 62. That is the highest we’ve ever had. The two are in training. One is starting the Academy and one is finishing the Academy. That happens as time goes on. There are retirements, resignations, etc. It takes time to replace them. Unfortunately we don’t have a bullpen, you know, where baseball players just wave and say come on in. It takes a period of time. Sixty-two is the maximum we’ve ever had.

 

CLWN MARINCIC:  When did they leave?

 

CHIEF MURPHY: One in July and the other in December.

 

CLWN MARINCIC:  From the minute we hire a police officer, how long is it before they are allowed to be on the road by themselves?

 

CHIEF MURPHY: It depends on whether they’re already certified when we hire them or not. If they’re already certified it’s about three months, but most of them are not certified so it’s about seven months. They have to go to school for four months approximately and then come back for field training, depending on whether they’re certified or possibly could have been a police officer somewhere else when we don’t have to send them to the Academy by law.

 

CLWN MARINCIC:  Thank you.

 

CHMN LIOTTA:  Do you have anything else? Is there a motion to adjourn?

 

CLWN MAHONEY:  I make a motion to adjourn the meeting.

 

CLWN MARINCIC:  I second it.

 

CHMN LIOTTA adjourned the meeting at 7:17 p.m.

 

Approved,                                                                                 Respectfully submitted,

 

____________________                                                        ____________________

Vincent Liotta                                                                           Barbara Molin

Chairman of the Safety Committee                                             Clerk of Council